UN Staff Member: 5G Is War on Humanity

A great video by Claire Edwards, a UN Staff Member, reporting on high levels of RFR/EMF radiation in the UN Vienna International Centre

Most people that are awake and have half a brain know that there is a “thing” called 5G being built to make cellular communications much “better”. The selling points include being able to download a video in a fraction of the time that is currently possible.  It seems that all of the companies that have a financial stake in this the 5G roll-out are spending millions because they hope to make billions of dollars.  It is all about money and nothing about potential health problems.

In this video the UN Secretary General says that he knows nothing about 5G and even the health effects of 4G or WiFi.  Either he is really uninformed,  really stupid, or is pretending that he is uninformed or stupid because otherwise why is he ignorant of this very important issue.  Maybe he is protecting industry in their huge 5G program.

Audit of BC Smart Meters Too Shallow. Sharon Noble – January 18, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – January 18, 2019

(audio 26:06) Audit of BC Smart Meters Too Shallow. Sharon Noble – January 18, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – YouTube – January 18, 2019:
(Italian courts order warning labels on cell phones

 

(podcast 25:56) January 18, 2019 | Audit of BC Smart Meters Too Shallow – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard – HoweStreet.com – January 18, 2019:
https://www.howestreet.com/2019/01/18/audit-of-bc-smart-meters-too-shallow/

= = =

The Goddard Report Video Archives of Interviews with Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters re Smart Meters and Health Issues from Wireless Technologies:

 

See BCUC & Smart Meter Fires Report (July 2017): http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/bcuc-smart-meter-fires-the-failure-to-protect/)

Microwave Oven Radiation Test

We all know that Microwave ovens cook food by beaming high levels of microwave radiation (MWR) into an enclosed space in which food is placed.  This MWR heats up the water molecules and “bingo” the food gets cooked.  There are some major concerns about the changes in the food that may have impacts on our health but that is covered elsewhere.

My objective here was to measure the actual MWR created by the MW Oven in my house.

I know that there is MWR leakage so when I use the oven I immediately move away to about 10 feet or more to decrease my exposure.

I measured and recorded the levels of MWR (a band of Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) using a GigaHertz HF59B and NFA1000.

The results are:

  • Oven off – 20-30 µW/m² (background, cell towers)
  • MWR at 9 feet – 400-1,000 µW/m²
  • MWR at 4 feet – 6000-12,000 µW/m²
  • MWR at 2 feet – 10,000-20,000 µW/m²

How does this relate to standards of RFR/MWR/EMF exposure?

Federal safety limits (6 GHz) - set by Industry
 - based on thermal heating of flesh for 6 min.
 - no consideration on impact of body chemistry
ICNIRP- 10,000,000 µW/m²
CHINA - 100,000 µW/m²
CANADA- 10,000,000 µW/m² - (Safety Code 6 - 2015) 

Limits recommended by Independent Researchers
Building Biology Precautionary (SBM-2015)
- severe Concern =  10-1,000 µW/m²
- Extreme Concern =  Over 1,000 µW/m²

Bio-Initiative Report 2012
- Precautionary level = 6 µW/m²

If you believe the standards set by industry then you can stand in front of your microwave oven when it is on for ever.
However if you believe that independent researchers may be closer to the truth then I suggest that you stand as far away from an operating MW oven as possible.  And certainly do not peer through its window to see how the food is being cooked.

Rodney Palmer – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada

Wireless technology is largely seen as benevolent and kind. Any danger to our health is typically passed off to the next generation to figure out, regardless of the consequences that have happened already. This story has played out many times in the past, whether it be DDT, cigarettes, or leaded paint. However, as Wi-Fi proliferates throughout our schools with potential dangers for our children’s health, some are courageous enough to fight back against this under-studied science.

Rodney Palmer, an award-winning Canadian journalist and Communications Advisor at the Safe School Committee, has been speaking out about the dangers of Wifi in public schools since at least 2010.  In a presentation to the Royal Society of Canada, he spoke about a wifi disaster at a public elementary school that injured dozens of students. The story is quite remarkable.

 

See source website at https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/01/08/award-winning-journalist-exposes-wifi-disaster-in-canadian-public-school-that-injured-dozens-of-children

20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth

5G Wireless Internet Service Satellite Signal 3d Illustration

by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.

In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.

As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.

The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]

The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]

5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones

See full article at

http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/

 

BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters. Sharon Noble – January 4, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – January 04, 2019

(audio 27:43) BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters. Sharon Noble – January 4, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – YouTube – January 04, 2019:
(Smart meters, wifi, so many ways to hack into our infrastructure

 

(podcast 27:26) January 4, 2019 | BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard – HoweStreet.com – January 04, 2019:
https://www.howestreet.com/2019/01/04/bc-premier-breaks-promises-on-smart-meters/

= = =

The Goddard Report Video Archives of Interviews with Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters re Smart Meters and Health Issues from Wireless Technologies:

 

See BCUC & Smart Meter Fires Report (July 2017): http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/bcuc-smart-meter-fires-the-failure-to-protect/)

Royal Society of Canada – Expert Panel Review of Safety Code 6 & Public Consultation Videos – October 28, 2013

Below are some links and videos re the Expert Panel Review of Safety Code 6 & Public Consultations which took place in October 2013.

Wireless radiation safety hearing criticized – Expert panel from Royal Society of Canada reviewing updates to Health Canada guidelines – CBC News – October 28, 2013:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/wireless-radiation-safety-hearing-criticized-1.2254862

Royal Society of Canada – Review of Safety Code 6 – 2013:

(scroll down)

Safety Code 6 – C4ST:

 

Arlene Dewdney – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXDED7Js0_M

Andrew Michrowski – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAWba6CfOrg

Bob McGahey – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZX7y-yGZPU

Brigitte Blais – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qXcv3xrpc4

Charlene Acres – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 30, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6yUpx9Ved8

Curtis Bennett – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7dYR1MZ3c

Dan Welland – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx6duSQy1Kk

Deborah McCutcheon – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vXQ127xQl8

Frank Clegg – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igWAzWUuZLk

Jean Gagnon – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu119EpdQD0

Julie Fredette – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lJj9LuFq1M

Kristin Morrison – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVSTRQbuSHI

Marcey Kliparchuk – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BDQi2CD-Ao

Margaret Friesen – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5s7s2dOMLw

Martin Blank – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-thcrRUCUU

Michael Meszaros – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHn9kDfOoiA

Norm Ryder – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Why5FSkRAAI

Rodney Palmer – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsPBUuwCfaI

Sharon Noble – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU-LaSUJ9aU

Todd White – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeJqR07w_OI

Una St. Clair – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfBDNumBi9s

Veronica Ciandre – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG-C-iI2VBw

Veronique Riopel – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 30, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZESi8VLUtRY

Wendy Cockburn – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N0TBb76Egk

Wendy Perkins – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013:

 

Planetary Electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact

Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact

Bandara P, Carpenter DO. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. The Lancet. 2(12):Pe512-e514, December 01, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3.

Download open access paper: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext

Since this commentary has no abstract, here are the first and last paragraphs:

“As the Planetary Health Alliance moves forward after a productive second annual meeting, a discussion on the rapid global proliferation of artificial electromagnetic fields would now be apt. The most notable is the blanket of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, largely microwave radiation generated for wireless communication and surveillance technologies, as mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects. However, public exposure regulations in most countries continue to be based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), which were established in the 1990s on the belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous. Prevention of tissue heating by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is now proven to be ineffective in preventing biochemical and physiological interference. For example, acute non-thermal exposure has been shown to alter human brain metabolism by NIH scientists, electrical activity in the brain, and systemic immune responses. Chronic exposure has been associated with increased oxidative stress and DNA damage and cancer risk.

Laboratory studies, including large rodent studies by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) and Ramazzini Institute of Italy, confirm these biological and health effects in vivo. As we address the threats to human health from the changing environmental conditions due to human activity, the increasing exposure to artificial electromagnetic radiation needs to be included in this discussion.”

<snip>

“At a time when environmental health scientists tackle serious global issues such as climate change and chemical toxicants in public health, there is an urgent need to address so-called electrosmog. A genuine evidence-based approach to the risk assessment and regulation of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields will help the health of us all, as well as that of our planetary home. Some government health authorities have recently taken steps to reduce public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation by regulating use of wireless devices by children and recommending preferential use of wired communication devices in general, but this ought to be a coordinated international effort.”

Most relevant posts on Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

International EMF Scientist Appeal

Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G

ICNIRP’s Exposure Guidelines for Radio Frequency Fields

WHO Radiofrequency Radiation Policy

What’s Wrong with Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits? (SAR)

NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study: Final Reports

Ramazzini Institute Cell Phone Radiation Study Replicates NTP Study

5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?

Cell Phone Towers are Largest Contributor to Environmental Radiofrequency Radiation

Cell Tower Health Effects

Cell Tower Radiation Affects Wildlife: Dept. of Interior Attacks FCC

Electromagnetic fields threaten wildlife

International Perspective on Health Effects of Low Intensity Non-Ionizing RadiationPowerWatch: 1,670 Scientific Papers on EMF (1979 – 2018)

Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: 833 Studies

Recent Research on Wireless Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields (> 500 studies)

——————-

Thanks to Joel Moskowitz for sending this out.

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Website:   https://www.saferemr.comFacebook:  https://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
Twitter:   @berkeleyprc