2015-09-21 Federal judge upholds Berkeley’s “right to know” re cell phones

  • A federal judge upheld Berkeley’s authority to require cell phone retailers to tell customers that carrying switched-on phones too close to their bodies might exceed federal radiation-exposure standards, but barred a warning that “this potential risk is greater for children. No doubt the cell phone companies will appeal.

 

“There is a reasonable scientific basis to believe that (radio-frequency radiation emissions) at some levels can and do present health risks,” the judge said.

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Judge-blocks-Berkeley-s-warning-about-cell-6520282.php

 

 

 

  • A note from a member in Victoria reminding us to use this time, when candidates are willing to talk with us because they want our vote, to send them a message:

 

“Last week a volunteer called me to see if I was going to support Randall Garrison and I told her I was mad at him because I had called his office several times to make an appointment and he never called me back.  He didn’t respond to any of my emails either.  Why would I vote for someone who ignores the very people he is supposed to be representing? He called me tonight and I told him I wanted him to support Bill C648 the RIGHT TO KNOW on wireless technology packaging. I also told him that I represent large groups of parents who want to know who is going to bring their health concerns before the Parliament Committee and update Health Canada because their children are at risk because of mandatory exposure. Randall said he was aware that Murray Rankin supported the HESA Committee but hasn’t had the chance to talk to him about it?  Why not? Randall did say he would look into it.  Please contact your MP and tell them to support the RIGHT TO KNOW!  And write a letter to Murray Rankin to thank him for supporting Bill C648.”    http://www.c4st.org/CandidatesWhoCare

 

  • Attached is an article about EHS, responding to the question “is it real?”

 

 

  • Collectors:

Colwood (Victoria, West Shore)  451 Dressler

 

  • Belpomme practices in Switzerland and has a clinic in which he studies, diagnoses and treats EHS.  Here is a recent interview, in French.  The translation that was provided is below, in letters.

http://www.faire-face.fr/2015/09/11/electrosensibilite-belpomme-syndrome/

 

  • A member sent in news about 2 fires on Hydro poles resulting in outages in the Comox Valley on Sunday, both at the same time in different locations. I have asked some technical people if the smeters or collectors could have contributed to it, but my guess is that it’s because Hydro is not spending money where it is needed – in upgrading infrastructure instead of on smeters.  If I find out anything else, I’ll let you know.

http://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=708270&binId=1.1180928&playlistPageNum=1#_gus&_gucid=&_gup=Facebook&_gsc=sMbdMrS

*******************************

Letters:

 

From: X
Sent: September 19, 2015 8:03 PM
To: Bing.MLA, Doug <Doug.Bing.MLA@leg.bc.ca>; rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca; bill.bennett.mla@leg.bc.ca; premier@gov.bc.ca
Subject: Fascism in action

 

Hello Cheryl/Gay:

This email is addressed to you, not MLA Bing.

 

By the silence of MLA Bing and his fellow MLA’s, of all parties, these individuals are supporting the type of fascist tactics as documented below. The politicians like Campbell, Coleman, and yes, now MLA Bing by his silence which signals complicity, have allowed BC Hydro to be hijacked and enrolled us all in a future global surveillance and control grid. This will apply to you, and your family as well. You won’t always be employed by MLA Bing. You’ll behave in the future according to expectation, or you won’t have power, or perhaps you’ll have a preemptive visit from CSIS or some other police authority if you do something the ‘government’ (which is no longer of the people, if it ever was) does not like. The technology is now being deployed, by force as we can see, to allow unseen and unknown forces almost complete control of populations.

 

I’d just like to point out that you also have a responsibility to society, and to constituents, and yourselves, in stopping this descent into a very dark future, of which most people are not aware, and prefer not to be aware. Power meters don’t need to have the ability to spy on people, or to turn power on and off, and they don’t need to operate by microwave girds that are known to initiate and promote cancerous tumors, do they? The analogs worked perfectly well, were far cheaper, and did no harm. But they didn’t have the capability to enslave entire populations via communications technology.

 

It’s hard to step out line and question authority. But when your future depends on it, perhaps its time to consider it. Perhaps MLA Bing simply cannot able to muster the moral courage to do the right thing, but that does not excuse you, and others who directly support this sick and corrupt government.

 

Thanks for your consideration.

 

X

—————————–

Electrosensitivity, a wholly disease – Faire Face, 11th September 2015
(Translation)

[Dominique Belpomme answers questions – please see the last line in particular]

Interview by Johanna Amselem

Justice recently acknowledged the existence of a disability linked to electrosensitivity to magnetic waves. The symptoms are real but the cause has not yet been scientifically established. For Professor Belpomme, oncologist and member of the anti-cancer therapeutic Research Association (ARTAC), it is a wholly disease.

“Together physical disorders, according to the description of people, excessive sensitivity to the waves and ambient electromagnetic fields”: here is the definition of electrosensitivity proposed by Larousse 2016 edition.

While justice has just recognized as a serious handicap to the hypersenbilité magnetic waves, experts are still divided on the subject. In 2013, ANSES issued a report in which it estimated that exposure to electromagnetic waves could cause some biological effects but that the current scientific evidence showed no health effects.

For its part, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized in 2005 that electrosensitivity was “characterised by various non-specific symptoms that differ from individual to individual” and “are certainly real and can be of very variable severity. ”

Prof. Belpomme, he receives consulting those who suffer. He gives his views.

Coping: What is the electro-hypersensitivity?

Pr Dominique Belpomme: An intolerance to electromagnetic fields. This syndrome is characterized by headaches, pain in one ear (for those abusing cell phones), tingling, burning, dizziness false and very often, cognitive disorders.
In 20% of cases, patients cannot even read a book. Others also suffer from insomnia, chronic fatigue and a depressive tendency. They can not stand close to the waves.

FF: How to relieve the sick?

Pr DB: In seven out of ten, intolerance has improved significantly with treatment consisting of antioxidants, antihistamines and vitamin and intense therapy. This reduces the symptomatic intolerance and normalizes biological markers but, unfortunately, does not reduce the electro-hypersensitivity, hence the need to protect the patients.

In some cases, the change is not favorable and can occur a violation of the nervous system such as Alzheimer’s disease or Parkinson’s disease. We need the government to seize this public health problem.

FF: Are children involved?

Pr DB: Yes, they can also be victims of this electro-hypersensitivity syndrome, including infants. There is a genetic susceptibility even though it has not been demonstrated.

By cons, excessive exposure may lead to epigenetic abnormalities. It is very important that during pregnancy, women do not use a mobile phone, except in emergencies, and begin to free wifi. With young children, we must avoid leaving (living) before a lighted screen, do not use a mobile in their presence and keep them away from sources wifi. To preserve, we do not phone in transport.

FF: Over the years, the number of patients he increases?

Pr DB: This hypersensitivity could affect one in two in Europe. In France, 1-2% of the population would already be a victim. Currently, I see ten new patients per week. General practitioners also recognize increasingly that problem, one in two patients addressed me by them.

FF: What will change this ruling?

Pr DB: The decision of the Toulouse Tribunal should jurisprudence. Now some experts deny the problem when the patients are real them. If this is not the electromagnetic fields, what do they suffer? It’s really a denial face reality.

In the coming months, the US scientific journal Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) publish the results of our studies on this subject.

EHS_Analysis_Evelyn_Savarin

******************************************

Sharon

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”   Albert Einstein

 

https://www.facebook.com/Coalitiontostopsmartmeters?fref=ts