This decision of the Court of Appeal of Turin is historic!
(….This is the second Italian appeal judgment in favour of a worker after the Brescia judgment in 2010, which concluded with the confirmation of the Supreme Court in 2012, case of Marcolini v. INAIL.
In this case, the Court of Bergamo had rejected the application in first instance.
A landmark judgment that will have international repercussions
The Romeo v. INAIL case is therefore historic. It is the first in world judicial history to have had two consecutive judgments in favour of the plaintiff. It is also historic because of the principles underlying this decision and particularly because it is written about the conflicts of interest of certain experts close to the mobile phone industry.
Conflicts of interest and the role of the ICNIRP pinpointed by the Tribunal
Indeed, the Tribunal recognizes that telephone industry-funded scientists, or members of the ICNIRP, are less reliable than independent scientists: ….)
Thank you for relaying it as widely as possible.
The Phonegate Alert Team
To learn more on the same subject:
Italy: a landmark judgment requires the state to inform the population of the health risks due to mobile phones
Mobil World Congress: industrialists and public authorities urged to take into account the health effects of mobile technologies (video of Stefano Bertone)
Phonegate Alert invited to the International conference Stop 5G at the Italian Parliament
Copyright © Alerte Phonegate Tous droits réservés.
Adresse mail contact: firstname.lastname@example.org