1) 5G technology is dangerous in so many ways, yet the industry is pushing forward with its agenda. Health, invasion of privacy, pollution of the environment and interfering with weather forecasting. There are no benefits that can justify these risks.
Hurricane tracking technology is about to regress 30 years, thanks to 5G cell networks
5G networks will likely claim lives by impeding hurricane forecasting — and the wireless industry doesn’t care
“In May 2019, Neil Jacobs, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), testified before Capitol Hill that 5G wireless signals could decrease forecasting accuracy by 30 percent.
“This would degrade the forecast skill by up to 30%. If you look back in time to see when our forecast skill was roughly 30% less than it was today, it’s somewhere around 1980,” Jacobs said in May. “This would result in the reduction of hurricane track[ing] forecasts’ lead time by roughly two to three days.” A delay of two to three days could have a catastrophic effect on human life.
“Even though the radiation associated with 5G technologies hasn’t been investigated as extensively as that associated with current cell phone technologies, there is a substantial body of literature and evidence to indicate a significant impact of exposure on human health and development,” Dr. Jerry Phillips, a professor at the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Colorado, told Salon in 2018. “Of concern here are not just the potential effects of 5G-associated radiation, but what might result from the combined impact of 5G-radiation with other sources of non-ionizing radiation in our environment. Certainly, a more careful and thorough assessment of the risks to human and environmental health are warranted.”
2) This YouTube concentrates on smeters and 5G. In the first few minutes, the health effects at various power densities are explained. The measurement of the signals of the smeters is very conservative compared with the admitted power found in ITRON’s document to the FCC that I shared in 2016: http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/z/2016-09-27-another-lie-exposed-this-about-rf-levels-of-smeters/ in which its smeters’ main transmitter’s power density is 227 microwatts per square centimeter, which is immensely higher than levels found to cause biological effects.
We’re Not Supposed To Show You This.. ALERT MESSAGE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEl-w-zxu6k (14:56 min.)
3) Apple has been producing and selling cellphones that emit levels of radiation that exceed even the very high limits allowed by various governments. Class actions are being considered against these telecoms who demonstrate that they care more about profit than health. As per the prior item, cell phones can operate with signals that are far weaker. Why are they committing this deception and putting their customers’ lives at risk?
Apple’s iPhone: widespread deception over the real SAR levels
What comparisons can be made between the ANFR tests and those of the Chicago Tribune?
“First of all, they confirm, without possible doubt, that the distance allowed by international regulations to ensure the safety of users is completely inadequate. For 30 years, the distance used to carry out certifications and controls has been completely inappropriate in relation to our uses.
The regulations introduced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1996 are more stringent than our European and international standards based on the recommendations of ICNIRP:…
This has very significant consequences on our real exposure level in Europe. In a recent article published in April 2019 in the IEEE journal, Prof. Om Ghandi, after analyzing the results of the ANFR tests, confirmed that the difference in exposure between 1gr and 10gr increases between 2.5 and 3 times the SAR value for the user. For example, the iPhone 5 tested at 0mm is 5.321 W/kg for 10gr and for 1gr, between 12 and 15 W/kg, i.e. more than 6 to 7 times the value not to be exceeded.”
4) In the U.S., more states and communities are demanding more research into 5G. I may have shared this again, but it’s important and should be used as a template when presenting before Municipal Councils here in BC [http://www.civicinfo.bc.ca/12.asp] and Canada. The Bill requires a commission to investigate the environmental and biological effects of 5G (including 3G and 4G) with emphasis on the most vulnerable groups: children, pregnant women, the elderly and those with existing health problems.
New Hampshire bill to establish a commission to study the environmental and health effects of 5G has been signed into law
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants.” — Albert Camus