2018-03-15 Russians attacking electrical grid !!

[4G LTE – 5G Millimeter Wave Microcells / Small Cells Antennas Public Right-of-way Siting – Cancers (Acoustic Neuroma, Glioma, Lymphoma, Meningioma, Pituitary Adenoma, Thyroid) – Cell Towers – Cindy Russell – Comments by Lennart Hardell, Michael Carlberg, Lena Hedendahl on NTP Technical Reports (TR-595 Rats & TR-596 Mice) – Dafna TachoverDariusz Leszczynski – DHS – Doctor Ben-Ishai – Dragonfly – FBI – FCC – Group 1 – Hacking – Health Canada – Homeland Security Alert – IARC – ICNIRP – IoT – Maria CantwellMary McBride – Military Active Denial Weapons (Skin) – RF – Rick Perry, Energy Secretary – Robert MuellerRonald L. Melnick, NIH – Scott Aaronson, EEI – Security – Smart Grid – Studies – Symantec Corp. – WHO – Wi-Fi – Wireless Devices – Yuri Feldman | BC – Canada – China – Russia – Switzerland – Turkey – Kansas, USA] & (videos)

1) For a long time, cybersecurity experts have warned that our infrastructure is vulnerable, especially now that it is mostly digital and wireless. Some have advised returning to analog. Now the USA is advising that the Russians have been attacking into the electrical grid. It is just a matter of time before a major attack results in millions of people returning to the Dark Ages. Let’s hope we are not part of that grid.

Cyber-attacks are literally happening hundreds of thousands of times a day, Energy Secretary Rick Perry told lawmakers.

(click on photos to enlarge)

Russian Hackers Attacking U.S. Power Grid and Aviation, FBI Warns

“Russian hackers are conducting a broad assault on the U.S. electric grid, water processing plants, air transportation facilities and other targets in rolling attacks on some of the country’s most sensitive infrastructure, U.S. government officials said Thursday.

The announcement was the first official confirmation that Russian hackers have taken aim at facilities on which hundreds of millions of Americans depend for basic services. Bloomberg News reported in July that Russian hackers had breached more than a dozen power plants in seven states, an aggressive campaign that has since expanded to dozens of states, according to a person familiar with the investigation.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-15/russian-hackers-attacking-u-s-power-grid-aviation-fbi-warns

(video 00:38) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2018-03-16/russian-hackers-attacking-american-services-video

2)  “Dr.” Mary McBride continues to misrepresent herself and science on behalf of the industry. This is 8 years after I outed her the first time, and it’s continuing. I hope that you will consider writing about her as well as her statements. (After my reporting this error in the article, “Dr.” was changed to “Professor”, which isn’t much better. She is NOT a professor. Even the U of BC concedes she is a “clinical” professor, an honorary title, not an academic one.)

Five ways to reduce the physical harms of smartphone use

“Researchers continue to investigate the possibility that exposure to radio-frequency radiation could cause brain tumours. So far, results from studies dating back to the 1980s have been reassuring. According to reviews conducted by Canadian experts in 2014 and 2016 [s/b http://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/EH/RPS/BCCDC%20RF%20Health%20Report.pdf], studies of radio-frequency radiation have not provided results that could reasonably support a link between cancers and other illnesses,” said Dr. Mary McBride of the BC Cancer Agency.

In February, the National Toxicology Program at the U.S. National Institutes of Health released two major reports that found no increase in illness or death in rodents subjected to the equivalent of much higher radio-frequency radiation exposure than humans receive. “

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/article-five-ways-to-reduce-the-physical-harms-of-smartphone-use/

As well, the article is factually incorrect regarding the NTP study. I suspect that McBride had her hand in this, too.

– https://ehtrust.org/science/facts-national-toxicology-program-cellphone-rat-cancer-study/

Here [http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Comments-on-NTP-Technical-Reports-Hsd-Sprague-Dawley-SD-Rats-and-B6C3F1-N-Mice-by-Lennart-Hardell-Michael-Carlberg-Lena-Hedendahl-March-12-2018-1.pdf] is a letter from Drs. Hardell and Carlberg regarding the results, which are summarized below in Letters. The effects are serious enough for these internationally-renowned experts to call for microwave radiation to be labelled as a carcinogen, yet McBride says everyone should be reassured that there are no links to cancer or other illnesses.

3)  The Future of 5G is like a cancer, growing without any control or limit.  The density of cell transmitters in cities could force many people to head for the country, and even there they may not be free of microwave radiation.

– http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1185257539756/

What is a 5G network and how can it change your life?

http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1185257539756/
CBC The National (7:20 minutes)

4)  Instead of encouraging studies to determine if higher frequencies have serious health effects, ICNIRP, an agency that establishes exposure guidelines used by WHO, Health Canada, FCC, etc. is rigging the system. It is loaded with industry people who are apparently going to call our skin “limbs” so that higher exposure limits apply. Could the telecoms be more blatant with their disregard for our health?

5G And The IOT: Scientific Overview Of Human Health Risks
HUMAN SKIN WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS AN EXTREMITY ALLOWING HIGHER EXPOSURES
“Our skin is our largest organ. Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, Chief Editor of Radiation and Health has stated that the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection usually referred to as ICNIRP – is developing recommendations for public exposure limits of these higher frequencies is planning to classify all the skin in the human body as belonging to the limbs rather than to the head or torso. Leszczynski cautioned that, “If you classify skin as limbs – no matter where the skin is – you are permitted to expose it more than otherwise.”…
 
5G is being developed and implemented without adequate evaluation of the effect of this technology on human health after long term exposure to these frequencies. Peer reviewed research studies have found adverse effects from the electromagnetic frequencies currently in use and that will be in use for this new technology.
 
“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.”

https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-networks-iot-scientific-overview-human-health-risks/

Letters:

– https://ehtrust.org/science/facts-national-toxicology-program-cellphone-rat-cancer-study/

Från: Dafna Tachover  (name given in widely circulated newsletters)
Skickat: 15 mars 2018

Ämne: IMP: Prof Hardell & Prof. Carlberg Evaluation of the NTP Study & Overall Carcinogenic Evidence

Hi All,

Yesterday I received from Prof. Hardell the letter he wrote to the National Toxicology Program with Prof. Carlberg. The paper is attached. [http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Comments-on-NTP-Technical-Reports-Hsd-Sprague-Dawley-SD-Rats-and-B6C3F1-N-Mice-by-Lennart-Hardell-Michael-Carlberg-Lena-Hedendahl-March-12-2018-1.pdf]

The letter provides a review of the NTP results how and an updated detailed analysis of the strength of the existing scientific data which takes into consideration the impact of the NTP results regarding the correlation between microwave radiation and various types of cancer.

The letter provides many visual colorful graphs which are quite helpful when providing information to public officials. This letter is the most current evaluation of the data and is an invaluable tool to our advocacy efforts.

Following is their overall evaluation of the level of evidence of carcinogenic activity for various types of cancers:

Glioma: Clear evidence

Vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma): Clear evidence

Meningioma: Equivocal evidence

Pituitary tumor (adenoma): Equivocal evidence

Malignant lymphoma: Equivocal evidence

Skin (cutaneous tissue): Equivocal evidence

Multi-site carcinogen: Some evidence

Thyroid cancer: Some evidence

Their unequivocal conclusion:

“Based on the IARC preamble to the monographs, RF radiation should be classified as Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans.”

Thank you Prof. Hardell and Prof. Carlberg for your continuous dedicated, relentless and excellent work.

Dafna

– http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/4/3793/htm

 

Sharon Noble
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters​

“There’s a moment when you have to choose whether to be silent or to stand up.”
~ Malala …

www.facebook.com/Coalitiontostopsmartmeters