[5G Appeal by Scientists and Doctors – AAEM – Auditor General Petitions 255 & 255B by Dennis & Sharon Noble – C. Romero-Sierra – Cell Phones – Cell Towers – Children – Conflict of Interest – Doctor George Carlo – EHS – EMR – Environmental Pollution by Microwave Radiation – FM Transmitters – Gro Harleem Brundtland – Health Canada Safety Code 6 – Industry Canada – International Doctors’ Appeal 2012 – International EMF Scientist Appeal – James McNamee Testimony re City of Chateauguay v. Rogers Communications – J.A. Tanner – J. Bigu del Blanco – Johannes Rau – Magda Havas – Marcus Schluschen Letter to Maura Forrest, National Post – Martin Blank – NRC National Research Council Non-thermal Effects Flow Chart – NTP – RF – Riina Bray – Telus eNodeB / Microcells / Small Cells Transmitter Maps – William Rea – Wireless Devices – Zory R. Glaser‘s Archives of Studies | Campbell River & Kamloops & Otter River & Saanich & Terrace & Victoria, BC – Toronto, Ontario – Chateauguay, Quebec – EU – Norway – Switzerland – Dallas, Texas, USA] & (video)
1) In last night’s update, I provided an article from the National Post re. Auditor General petitions re. EMR/wireless devices/ Health Canada, etc. and I encouraged you to make comments on the article itself or to write the author. Below is an excellent letter from one of our members which, hopefully, will encourage more letters to be sent to encourage more such articles and to help educate her on the topic.
(click on photos to enlarge)
Here is a website where you can read the various petitions that have been submitted going back for many years.
If you scan down, you will see petitions 255 [http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/pet_255_e_31626.html] and 255B [http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/pet_255B_e_32184.html] which Dennis and I wrote in 2008 in which we addressed, among other things, the issue of conflicts of interest in Health Canada. Names have been redacted. Should you wish to read the petition with names included, I will have them posted on our website under “Health/Science – Appeals/Petitions”.
I hope some of you will consider submitting your own petition. We have so many issues to address, so many concerns that are being ignored. We may not get all the answers, but we will draw attention to the fact that people are aware of the problems and are concerned.
2) More info about Telus microcells that have been installed in various areas. These charts give a good idea of the density of the transmitters – there could be more.
Campbell River – http://emrabc.ca/?page_id=11961
Kamloops – http://emrabc.ca/?page_id=11911
Otter River – http://emrabc.ca/?page_id=11967
Saanich – http://emrabc.ca/?page_id=11880
Terrace – http://emrabc.ca/?page_id=11954
3) As long ago as 1973, people in the Canadian government were concerned about the future proliferation of devices that would emit microwave radiation and recommended research to determine if there was a safe level and what it might be. Even before then, the USA government had done testing showing that exposure to RF/microwave radiation caused health effects – many studies and reports were given to Dr. Havas who put them on her website: www.magdahavas.com under “Zory’s archives” [http://www.magdahavas.com/category/from-zorys-archive/].
From: Marcus Schluschen (name given with permission)
Sent: October 06, 2017
Subject: Your cell phone radiation article
Dear Ms. Forrest,
Your recent article in the National Post on cell phone radiation is very much appreciated. The reason most people are not aware of the adverse health effects of wireless technology, is the general lack of media coverage regarding this growing health concern.
As a journalist, I am sure you appreciate gaining knowledge regarding radiofrequency microwave radiation and the massive amount of the latest research, which even includes the US Government Toxicology Research Program, proving biological harm to man and the environment.
There are a few simple facts, which are largely not known:
* Governments make billions of dollars in airwave auctions, therefore, nobody wants to stop the ‘gravy train’.
* Health Canada’s outdated ‘Safety Code 6’ has been condemned as “non protective” by international EMF scientists, as it only considers thermal heating effects.
HC very own scientist, Mr. McNamee, admitted before a Superior Quebec Court hearing, that biological effects are NOT considered in Code 6!
* The telecom industry does anything in its power to discredit scientists who do not endorse their products as safe.
The huge telecom lobby attempted to discredit Dr. George Carlo, who led a multimillion dollar cell phone research project, involving over 200 international scientists in the 90ties. After 5 years of cell phone research, it became evident that prolonged cell phone use triggers adverse and irreversible biological damage. Dr. Carlo refused to bend to their bribes and pressure tactics! At the time, 1/2 hour cell phone use, was considered ‘heavy use’.
Here are a few websites all good journalists should become familiar with:
International EMF Scientists Appeal to the Unites Nations and the WHO. (234 scientists from 41 nations)
The 3 min. video [https://vimeo.com/123468632] by cellular researcher, Dr. Martin Blank, provides basic insight into the health issues.
Scientists and doctors warn of potential serious health effects of 5G
3 pages of excellent information! Learn of the scientists & doctors impressive credentials, page 4-10,
This is a must read, as the imbedded links pride a massive amount of information on the latest science.
International Doctors Appeal 2012 – click links on the right hand side: Doctors Appeal and EMF Guideline
Excellent medical information on only 2 pages!
Human, animal, and plant life is controlled by naturally occurring electromagnetic fields and signals. With their extremely low to very high frequencies, technical electromagnetic fields can interfere strongly with cell communication and metabolism.
Initially, the body’s natural healing capacity, in its attempt to maintain homeostasis, will correct imbalances through finely tuned control mechanisms. Prolonged electromagnetic stress, however, may lead to a chronic impairment of this important homeostatic response and result in disease.
Why am I concerned? My wife used work in the engineering office, at one of Canada’s largest telecom firms, contracted electro hyper-sensitivity (EHS), 8 years ago. Not possible?
That’s what we thought at first too, but we were wrong! EHS is profoundly life altering (devastating), to say the least.
Prof. Dr. Johannes Rau, head of The Paracelsus Clinic in Switzerland, treats thousands of EHS patients annually, many patients come from the US. While Dr. Riina Bray of The Woman’s College Hospital in Toronto, has a growing waiting list of patients with EHS.
The internationally respected Dr. Gro Harleem Brundtland, MD, former head of Norway and the WHO, contracted EHS while in office at the WHO. One doctor explained: “EHS is a correct and natural reaction to an unnatural environment.”
We hope your publication will examine the growing health crisis of wireless technology more closely, in the near future.
Please pass this information on to your colleagues, friends and family, so that they may be given the opportunity to inform themselves about the independent research, and learn how to protect themselves and their children from harm, void of corporate spin.
“Sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation is the emerging health problem of the 21st century. It is imperative health practitioners, governments, schools and parents learn more about it. The human health stakes are significant”.
William Rea, MD – Founder & Director of the Environmental Health Center, Dallas
Past President, American Academy of Environmental Medicine
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.”
~ B.F. Skinner