2019-01-17 Boston Globe — can your cellphone’s EMF make you sick?

1)  A major US newspaper published an article about EMR and cell phone radiation. Cece Ducette and Joel Moskowitz are asking for this to be spread widely, and for our support in promoting it. I hope you will consider taking a few minutes to help out.

“Dear EMF Leaders, 

With deep gratitude to Joel Moskowitz for helping to initiate this, and to David Carpenter for contributing, please see the article below that ran today in the Boston Globe. 

I would be grateful if you could take a moment to do one or more of the following: 

  1. Share widely in social media.
  2. Add a Comment to the article if you can; if you can’t sign in, send me your Comment and I’ll post it.
  3. Call the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, lend your expertise and ask how you can be of service in getting the fact sheets released. The Director of the Bureau of Environmental Health is Jana Ferguson, 617-624-5757. Call day or night, please leave a message if you get voicemail. 
  4. Leverage it in direct conversations with public servants to change policy; perhaps in conjunction with the New Hampshire bill just introduced to address 5G and health/environment. 

Here’s the article: 

Could your cellphone’s electromagnetic field make you sick? Hiawatha Bray, Boston Globe, 17 January 2019. 

Many thanks, please let me know if you have any questions. 

Cece 

Cecelia (Cece) Doucette, MTPW, BA

Technology Safety Educator

Understanding EMFs

Wireless Education

HiBR Conference

YouTube EMF Talks

https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/01/16/could-your-cellphone-electromagnetic-field-make-you-sick/Xfo6O3BM2bdCm7hXYMPVQO/story.html

2)    Hydro has discovered that bee colonies that have resided on its power poles are abandoning their hives. If there are any bee experts reading this, would you please contact BC Hydro and tell them about how EMR affects bees. There are many studies showing that wireless radiation disorients the workers, causing them to get lost or confused, or weakening the immune system, making them more vulnerable to viruses, etc.

Bees vanish from BC Hydro pole, renewing concern over dwindling numbers

“Island beekeepers are working closely with BC Hydro during the removal of hydro poles, which began Wednesday, to ensure the safe rehoming of the numerous bee colonies, which seek shelter in the hollow poles.

It was a disappointing day for those involved when the bees, which called the pole home for five years, were gone.”

https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/bees-vanish-from-bc-hydro-pole-renewing-concern-over-dwindling-numbers-1.4256911

3)  From Dr. Hardell’s blog, re. Italian court decision I had in yesterday’s update.  He says it so well.

Court rules on information on health risks from wireless phones

“No doubt this is a victory for public health. Similar decision should be made in all countries. We have the knowledge of health risks but the population is not informed due to negligence by government and media like in Sweden. We have the scientific evidence on risks to human beings and also the environment by no action in undertaken. (I think there are some typos and he means “also the environment but no action has been undertaken.”)  Instead, the 5th generation, 5G, of wireless communication is implemented without proper scientific studies on the risks (www.5gappeal.eu; www.emfcall.org).”

https://lennarthardellenglish.wordpress.com/2019/01/17/court-rules-on-information-on-health-risks-from-wireless-phones/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

4)  Another glioblastoma victim, a young mother who lived on Salt Spring.

http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Claire-Bachellerie-Glioblastoma.png

https://www.linkedin.com/in/claire-bachellerie-11583989/?originalSubdomain=ca

 

Sharon  Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters 

“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”   Albert Einstein

 

www.facebook.com/Coalitiontostopsmartmeters

Microwave Oven Radiation Test

We all know that Microwave ovens cook food by beaming high levels of microwave radiation (MWR) into an enclosed space in which food is placed.  This MWR heats up the water molecules and “bingo” the food gets cooked.  There are some major concerns about the changes in the food that may have impacts on our health but that is covered elsewhere.

My objective here was to measure the actual MWR created by the MW Oven in my house.

I know that there is MWR leakage so when I use the oven I immediately move away to about 10 feet or more to decrease my exposure.

I measured and recorded the levels of MWR (a band of Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) using a GigaHertz HF59B and NFA1000.

The results are:

  • Oven off – 20-30 µW/m² (background, cell towers)
  • MWR at 9 feet – 400-1,000 µW/m²
  • MWR at 4 feet – 6000-12,000 µW/m²
  • MWR at 2 feet – 10,000-20,000 µW/m²

How does this relate to standards of RFR/MWR/EMF exposure?

Federal safety limits (6 GHz) - set by Industry
 - based on thermal heating of flesh for 6 min.
 - no consideration on impact of body chemistry
ICNIRP- 10,000,000 µW/m²
CHINA - 100,000 µW/m²
CANADA- 10,000,000 µW/m² - (Safety Code 6 - 2015) 

Limits recommended by Independent Researchers
Building Biology Precautionary (SBM-2015)
- severe Concern =  10-1,000 µW/m²
- Extreme Concern =  Over 1,000 µW/m²

Bio-Initiative Report 2012
- Precautionary level = 6 µW/m²

If you believe the standards set by industry then you can stand in front of your microwave oven when it is on for ever.
However if you believe that independent researchers may be closer to the truth then I suggest that you stand as far away from an operating MW oven as possible.  And certainly do not peer through its window to see how the food is being cooked.

Rodney Palmer – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada

Wireless technology is largely seen as benevolent and kind. Any danger to our health is typically passed off to the next generation to figure out, regardless of the consequences that have happened already. This story has played out many times in the past, whether it be DDT, cigarettes, or leaded paint. However, as Wi-Fi proliferates throughout our schools with potential dangers for our children’s health, some are courageous enough to fight back against this under-studied science.

Rodney Palmer, an award-winning Canadian journalist and Communications Advisor at the Safe School Committee, has been speaking out about the dangers of Wifi in public schools since at least 2010.  In a presentation to the Royal Society of Canada, he spoke about a wifi disaster at a public elementary school that injured dozens of students. The story is quite remarkable.

 

See source website at https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/01/08/award-winning-journalist-exposes-wifi-disaster-in-canadian-public-school-that-injured-dozens-of-children

20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth

5G Wireless Internet Service Satellite Signal 3d Illustration

by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.

In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.

As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.

The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]

The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]

5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones

See full article at

http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/

 

BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters. Sharon Noble – January 4, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – January 04, 2019

(audio 27:43) BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters. Sharon Noble – January 4, 2019 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – YouTube – January 04, 2019:
(Smart meters, wifi, so many ways to hack into our infrastructure

 

(podcast 27:26) January 4, 2019 | BC Premier Breaks Promises on Smart Meters – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard – HoweStreet.com – January 04, 2019:
https://www.howestreet.com/2019/01/04/bc-premier-breaks-promises-on-smart-meters/

= = =

The Goddard Report Video Archives of Interviews with Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters re Smart Meters and Health Issues from Wireless Technologies:

 

See BCUC & Smart Meter Fires Report (July 2017): http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/bcuc-smart-meter-fires-the-failure-to-protect/)

Royal Society of Canada – Expert Panel Review of Safety Code 6 & Public Consultation Videos – October 28, 2013

Below are some links and videos re the Expert Panel Review of Safety Code 6 & Public Consultations which took place in October 2013.

Wireless radiation safety hearing criticized – Expert panel from Royal Society of Canada reviewing updates to Health Canada guidelines – CBC News – October 28, 2013:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/wireless-radiation-safety-hearing-criticized-1.2254862

Royal Society of Canada – Review of Safety Code 6 – 2013:

(scroll down)

Safety Code 6 – C4ST:

 

Arlene Dewdney – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXDED7Js0_M

Andrew Michrowski – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAWba6CfOrg

Bob McGahey – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZX7y-yGZPU

Brigitte Blais – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qXcv3xrpc4

Charlene Acres – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 30, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6yUpx9Ved8

Curtis Bennett – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7dYR1MZ3c

Dan Welland – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx6duSQy1Kk

Deborah McCutcheon – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vXQ127xQl8

Frank Clegg – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igWAzWUuZLk

Jean Gagnon – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu119EpdQD0

Julie Fredette – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lJj9LuFq1M

Kristin Morrison – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVSTRQbuSHI

Marcey Kliparchuk – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BDQi2CD-Ao

Margaret Friesen – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5s7s2dOMLw

Martin Blank – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-thcrRUCUU

Michael Meszaros – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHn9kDfOoiA

Norm Ryder – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Why5FSkRAAI

Rodney Palmer – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsPBUuwCfaI

Sharon Noble – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU-LaSUJ9aU

Todd White – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeJqR07w_OI

Una St. Clair – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 28, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfBDNumBi9s

Veronica Ciandre – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG-C-iI2VBw

Veronique Riopel – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – October 30, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZESi8VLUtRY

Wendy Cockburn – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 02, 2013: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N0TBb76Egk

Wendy Perkins – Safety Code 6 – Presentation to the Royal Society of Canada by mmyes7 – YouTube – November 03, 2013:

 

Planetary Electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact

Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact

Bandara P, Carpenter DO. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. The Lancet. 2(12):Pe512-e514, December 01, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3.

Download open access paper: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext

Since this commentary has no abstract, here are the first and last paragraphs:

“As the Planetary Health Alliance moves forward after a productive second annual meeting, a discussion on the rapid global proliferation of artificial electromagnetic fields would now be apt. The most notable is the blanket of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, largely microwave radiation generated for wireless communication and surveillance technologies, as mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects. However, public exposure regulations in most countries continue to be based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), which were established in the 1990s on the belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous. Prevention of tissue heating by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is now proven to be ineffective in preventing biochemical and physiological interference. For example, acute non-thermal exposure has been shown to alter human brain metabolism by NIH scientists, electrical activity in the brain, and systemic immune responses. Chronic exposure has been associated with increased oxidative stress and DNA damage and cancer risk.

Laboratory studies, including large rodent studies by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) and Ramazzini Institute of Italy, confirm these biological and health effects in vivo. As we address the threats to human health from the changing environmental conditions due to human activity, the increasing exposure to artificial electromagnetic radiation needs to be included in this discussion.”

<snip>

“At a time when environmental health scientists tackle serious global issues such as climate change and chemical toxicants in public health, there is an urgent need to address so-called electrosmog. A genuine evidence-based approach to the risk assessment and regulation of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields will help the health of us all, as well as that of our planetary home. Some government health authorities have recently taken steps to reduce public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation by regulating use of wireless devices by children and recommending preferential use of wired communication devices in general, but this ought to be a coordinated international effort.”

Most relevant posts on Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

International EMF Scientist Appeal

Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G

ICNIRP’s Exposure Guidelines for Radio Frequency Fields

WHO Radiofrequency Radiation Policy

What’s Wrong with Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits? (SAR)

NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study: Final Reports

Ramazzini Institute Cell Phone Radiation Study Replicates NTP Study

5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?

Cell Phone Towers are Largest Contributor to Environmental Radiofrequency Radiation

Cell Tower Health Effects

Cell Tower Radiation Affects Wildlife: Dept. of Interior Attacks FCC

Electromagnetic fields threaten wildlife

International Perspective on Health Effects of Low Intensity Non-Ionizing RadiationPowerWatch: 1,670 Scientific Papers on EMF (1979 – 2018)

Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: 833 Studies

Recent Research on Wireless Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields (> 500 studies)

——————-

Thanks to Joel Moskowitz for sending this out.

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Website:   https://www.saferemr.comFacebook:  https://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
Twitter:   @berkeleyprc





 

Letter to elected officials by Jerry Flynn 5G, magnetic fields

Dear Elected Officials,
For your sake and that of your constituents, please give this “5G” (fifth generation) technology ‘radiation’ the urgent attention it deserves!

Read the Dec. 3, 2018 news release from Washington, D.C.: “U.S. Senator Blumenthal from CT and REP. Eshoo from CA, both members of the Senate Committee that oversees the FCC (Federal Communications Committee), wrote a letter to the FCC demanding PROOF that “5G”is SAFE” to humans! [1]  https://ctmirror.org/2018/12/03/blumenthal-wants-fcc-prove-5g-wireless-technology-safe/

Here in B.C., Telus (with its Nationalist Chinese partner, Huawei) is salivating in anticipation of being able to roll-out its untested “5G,” which will completely saturate, literally, not just every inch of space in the City of Vancouver but all of B.C. (All major Western countries are planning to roll out their 5G as well.)

It should be noted that “5G” has never been tested (independently, free from industry influence) for safety to humans – anywhere in the world!

Also here in B.C., BC Hydro is in the early stages of preparing to build its ‘City of Vancouver-approved’ electrical substation – undergroundbeneath a downtown public park! And, once the substation is operational, BC Hydro is to build an elementary school on top of the substation!  Both BC Hydro’s former and current presidents have volunteered that, under peak demand, the underground substation can produce a magnetic field of 100 milligauss (mG), implying that this is perfectly safe! [2] [3]

BC Hydro is correct in saying that this level of magnetic field is just 5% of the allowable magnetic field of 2,000 mG, which Health Canada’s historically corrupt Radiation Protection Bureau (RPB) and their equally-corrupt colleagues at the WHO and the industry-biased agency ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) all endorse and promote! [4]

Contrast this, though, with what the BioInitiative 2012 Report (29 authors including 21 PhDs and 10 health experts from 10 countries) and their subsequent 2017 Report say: a ‘safe’ ambient (normal or constant) level of magnetic field should not exceed even 1 mG! [5]

So did the 2011 Seletun Statement in Norway recommend <1 mG! [6]  It has been known since 1979, that magnetic fields of 3-4 mG cause leukemia in children! As recently as 2017, it was also shown that pregnant women exposed to magnetic fields of between 2.5 mG and 6.2 mG had 3 times the risk of having a miscarriage! Women exposed to 16 mG or more had a six times greater risk of having a miscarriage! [7]

Those needing more evidence should read this 1999 document by New Zealand’s world-respected scientist: Dr. Neil Cherry ONZM (1946-2003), who said that magnetic fields of even 0.2 mG or more increase the risk of suicide by 22%! [8]

Also in 1999, the same Dr. Neil Cherry was the guest speaker at the World Conference on Breast Cancer, held in Ottawa, Canada, 26-31 July. The title of his speech: “Electromagnetic Radiation causes cancer: the implications for breast cancer.” [9]

Elected officials also need to realize that mainstream news media have, since the late 1960s, been complicit with the U.S. Military-Industrial-Complex (US M-I-C) by remaining largely silent on this whole issue of non-thermal radiation. Their indefensible silence has enabled electric power utilities and wireless and telecom companies to deliberately mislead, deceive and even lie to governments (you and all of your predecessors) to keep governments unaware of the following:

  • Since at least 1999, the world’s largest insurance companies have refused to insure ANY product that emits electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation! “The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure …” [10] [11]
  • The industry ‘captured’ U.S. F.C.C. has just approved SpaceX’s plan to launch more than 12,000 satellites to provide high-speed broadband – using “5G” frequencies – to every corner of the globe! And OneWeb plans to launch its first of 900 satellites in 2019 [12] This is on top of the 1886 satellites already operating!
  • Google’s “Project Loon” (designed to provide Internet access – using “5G” frequencies – to every region on earth) began in 2016 and involves thousands of high-altitude balloons encircling the earth at a height of about 12 miles (twice the height that planes fly). Facebook is working on a similar project and could be a potential competitor to Google [13]
  • The International Appeal: Stop “5G”on Earth and in Space.” Currently, more than 30,000 scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from around the world urgently call on all governments to halt deployment of “5G” wireless network, including “5G” from space satellites. [14]
  • The International EMF Scientists Appeal – to the United Nations, all U.N.-member nations, the Director General of the WHO urged them all to: “Protect Mankind and wildlife from electromagnetic radiation and wireless technology”! [15]
  • The $25-million, 10-year study conducted by the NTP Study on Cell Phones and Cancer in 2018 provided “clear evidence” that non-thermal EMF/R causes cancer! [16] [17] and the subsequent world’ largest Animal Study done by the renowned Ramazzini Institute, in Italy, on Cell Tower radiation “confirmed cancer link”! [18]

Fifty years ago few people had heard of Autism, ADHD, breast cancer, brain tumors, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, testicular cancer, colon cancer, leukemia and other cancers, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Lou Gehrig Disease (ALS), Sudden-Infant-Death-Syndrome (SIDS), suicides, depression, miscarriages, still-births, asthma, etc. Today they are disease epidemics in all industrialized countries! Yet no government has the temerity or courage to do anything!

Fifty years ago, few people had heard of a ‘special needs’ teacher. Today, they’re in most if not all schools.

In 2016, one in 36 children (1 in 28 boys) in the USA was autistic, and ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) has increased in lockstep with pediatric cancers!  Brain tumors / cancers are said to be the number one cause of children’s death from disease in the USA! It is also estimated that 1 in 2 Canadians and 1 in 3 Americans will get cancer in their lifetime! Yet no country on earth is calling for a national enquiry, let alone a national criminal investigation! This, in and of itself, is a crime!

Health spending is rapidly increasing in every jurisdiction, yet no cancer organization anywhere even mentions EMFs / EMR as being a possible suspect cause of cancer! Maybe now that U.S. Senator Blumenthal has raised the SAFETY issue, Canada will finally have the decency and the guts to look at the pandemic corruption and corporate greed that is harming and literally killing us!

As mentioned above, the above provides further indisputable evidence that Health Canada’s RPB (Radiation Protection Bureau), like their colleagues in the WHO, ICNIRP and the FCC, is irredeemably corrupt! Like the others, the RPB is knowingly and uncaringly sacrificing the public’s health and safety in favour of reaping enormous industrial profit! This was one of, if not the, reason why each agency elected to join the US M-I-C back in the 1960s.  (M-I-C = Military Industrial Complex)

In conclusion, because humans – like all living things – are bio-electrical beings, “5G” technology and all wireless RF products must immediately be banned in Canada (ideally, throughout the world).

This includes wireless ‘smart’ meters – each of which contains two microwave radio circuits! But one must not forget that non-industry scientists, globally, also classify extremely low or ‘power line’ (50 Hz/60 Hz) frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields (EMF)s a Category 1A or Known Human Carcinogen; therefore all power lines, substations, power transformers, electrical appliances, power tools and machinery, etc. must be kept at distances which are truly SAFE for humans, i.e., Gaussmeter readings at a school, home, hospital, place of work, etc. must not register a magnetic field greater than 1 mG!  This, of course, means that the City of Vancouver must immediately rescind its approval for BC Hydro to build the underground substation in downtown Vancouver, beneath a school!

Let the words: “honor,” “dignity,” “pride,” “honesty,” “decency,” “respect,” “trust,” “compassion,” “consideration,” “responsibility,” and “love for thy fellow man” once again mean something, as they did when I was a boy growing up in the Canada of which I was once proud!

Sincerely,

J.G. Flynn, Captain (Retired)

author of book “Hidden Dangers”
Bowser, B.C., V0R 1G0

References
[1]  https://ctmirror.org/2018/12/03/blumenthal-wants-fcc-prove-5g-wireless-technology-safe/

[2] https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/b-c-hydro-lays-plans-for-two-new-downtown-vancouver-substations-deep-underground
[3] https://www.bchydro.com/energy-in-bc/projects/west-end-substation.html

[4]  http://www.emrsa.co.za/who-rfr-and-health-a-hard-nut-to-crack-review/
[5]  http://www.bioinitiative.org/updated-research-summaries-december-2017/
[6 http://www.iemfa.org/seletun-statement/
[7] https://www.emfacts.com/2018/01/miscarriage-risks-linked-to-electromagnetic-field-exposure-power-frequency-elf-magnetic-fields/

[8] https://www.scribd.com/document/6473560/Dr-Neil-Cherry-Evidence-EMF-Harmfulall-wireless-radiation-hazards/

[9] http://www.neilcherry.nz/documents/90_s3_EMR-EMF_and_BREAST_Cancer.pdf

[10] https://www.rfsafe.com/lloyds-of-london-insurance-wont-cover-smartphones-wifi-smart-meters-cell-phone-towers-by-excluding

[11] https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/electromagnetic-field-insurance-policy-exclusions/

[12] https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/29/17178126/spacex-satellite-broadband-internet-fcc-approval-license-starlink-spectrum

[13] https://www.firstresearch.com/Industry-Research/Wireless-Telecommunications-Services.html

[14] https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/
[15] http://wirelessrighttoknow.com/intl-scientists-appeal/
[16] https://mdsafetech.org/ntp-study-2016/
[17] https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2018/4/feature/feature-2-cell-phone/index.htm
[18] https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/